To answer the answer to this blog post bluntly. I give the answer as a firm no, we can’t take science too far. The reason why this is even a question is because the big business don’t like progress, they don’t want to see the common man evolve, they want to hold the common man back and exploit him for their own greed, using all these moral panics to help keep us unaware of this. But I digress. The point of this blog post is to say just how far we can go ethically into transforming the human body into becoming the perfect machine. And I say that ethical qualms are subjective, we can not let ourselves worry laws and slow the inevitable progress because one person thinks they are ethically wrong. The reason why humans exist is to adapt and evolve, we have completed that as far we can in nature. So mankind must artificially generate our next stage of evolution, humankind must take destiny into its own hands or remain stagnant as our broken incomplete selves, it is only through science that we can truly become free and perfect. We can not afford to back down now and let ourselves fade into the sands of the universal destroyer known as time, humans have always accomplished the impossible, so maybe now we can banish the destruction and desecration of time on humankind and exist forever among the moon the sun and the stars. So that, even after the earth, moon, sun, and stars of the present have all faded away, our ancestors can exist as the showing of humankind's legacy to the rest of the universe and space itself
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2016
Categories |